![]() Which is better? Low mi point of view the following:īusiness: Either one could work and it all also depends on the data to be stored and in which positions in the company the computers will be.īut what nonsense. ![]() Little charged: This translates into better performance compared to other distros.ġ00% Free: Those who are not very purists will surely find some extra problems when installing certain applications since non-free and contrib are not activated as standard.Ĭycling Release: It forces us to suddenly update or reinstall the system with each release. Synaptic: It allows us to install applications without using the terminal.įriendly: The installation does not cause any fear to anyone, it is a typical next-next-next installation. deb: It allows us to install applications with a double click. Stability: This makes it an excellent alternative in places where we need high security conditions. Without being KISS, Debian is a less loaded system than, say, Linux Mint. It has 3 branches: Stable, Unstable (Sid) and Testing.Īs I was saying Debian seeks stability, which is why its versions take time to release and we do not have the latest.Ĭontrary to what many people think, Debian is quite a friendly distro, comparable to Fedora in this sense, but without being a Mageia-style distro (for example) as soon as it is installed.ĭebian is cycling release, this means that versions are frozen. It is a distro that uses 100% free packages as standard, thus avoiding the use of applications like Firefox, which are not 100% free. Peripherals: Installing peripherals like printers can be tedious in some cases.ĭebian is a well known distro for its stability, it does not use any base and also uses. Rolling release character: Being a rolling release can cause problems with some packages, although Arch Linux is one of the more stable distros. Installation: The installation can scare people new to Linux. Wiki: The Arch Linux Wiki is quite extensive, but it is not translated into all languages. tar.gz files.ĪBS: ABS allows us to package and build programs from their source code. Yogurt: This tool allows us to use the AUR repository, sometimes avoiding having to install. Pacman package manager: The Pacman package manager is a fairly fast manager. Rolling release character: We avoid reinstalling the distribution as new versions are not frozen. KISS principle: We assemble the system as we want, installing only what we need. It is rolling release, this means that it exempts us from reinstalling the system since versions of it are not released updating the system we will have the latest stable.īut it is not all gold that glitters, installation can become somewhat complicated thus intimidating inexperienced users and prolonging installation time. ![]() The distro's slogan says A simple lightweight distribution, which when translated means a simple and lightweight distribution.Īrch Linux seeks to keep a system as less loaded as possible, thus following the KISS principle (Keep It Simple, Stupid, in Spanish keep it simple, stupid) avoiding having pre-installed applications and other parts that we do not use to achieve better performance. Here I will analyze the advantages and disadvantages of these two distros as best I can considering that I like rolling releases KISSĪrch Linux is a distro originally inspired by the Crux distro although it currently has no basis. I bring an article that I wrote in Let's use Linux a long time ago elav y KZKG ^ Gaara they will stop distorting with Arch Linux Vs Debian all posts.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |